Aligned with approaches that push the boundary of live projects beyond the live build only, this paper presents an action-learning initiative in Ghana in a site forged by modernist practitioners under colonialism.
The notion of lived-in architecture is relied upon to apprehend how inhabitants re-shape and fabricate their dwelling environments.
Post-colonial critique has rearticulated urban development agendas but nonetheless neglected material realities.
An analysis of the subversive in the everyday dwelling practices of inhabitants is therefore required.
The issue will analyze how these appropriations speak back to the heroic accounts of modernism and to the optimistic transfers of instant development on the one hand; and to the discipline of urbanism on the other.
The variegated ways in which (modern) architectural artifacts have been “lived-in” may thus be employed as an orientation device not only to voice alternative city-making but also to redefine urbanism as the outcome of a multi-directional and entangled interplay.
In Latin American cities, modes of housing and settlement production are rapidly shifting with city-making becoming an increasingly unequal process.
User-based design for inclusive urban transformation: learning from ‘informal’ and ‘formal’ dwelling practices in Guayaquil, Ecuador, International Journal of Housing Policy.
The way inhabitants transform these top-down projects by means of adaptation, transformation, transfiguration and even subversion will be the core of this issue.
Working with only gold filled chains and semiprecious stones, her signature layered style is nothing short of sophisticated bliss.
While the Latin American region was once a cradle for ground-breaking research on incremental urban development, more recent housing policies have radically disengaged from incremental dwelling typologies and socially engaged design practices.
Using an inter-disciplinary methodology to map such contributions, students are exposed to the importance of voicing communities' tacit knowledge.
The analysis stresses the dialectic relationship between architectural artefacts and user-based transformations.
Indeed, the everyday construction of the city is grounded in lived experiences in space.